ED has Right to Investigate, Arrest and Confiscate Properties under PMLA: SC
ED has Right to Investigate, Arrest and Confiscate Properties under PMLA: SC 
National

ED has Right to Investigate, Arrest and Confiscate Properties under PMLA: SC

Deepak Sharma

On Wednesday, the Supreme Court has given its verdict on petitions challenging the constitutionality of various provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act in the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court has upheld the power of arrest given to the Enforcement Directorate while delivering the verdict. The Supreme Court has clearly said that arrest under money laundering is not arbitrary of the ED but a constitutional right of the investigating agency.

A bench of Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice Dinesh Maheshwari and Justice CT Ravikumar upheld the validity of the provisions of the PMLA (Prevention of Money Laundering Act) against which objections were raised.

242 people filed petition including Anil Deshmukh, Mehbooba Mufti

242 people filed petition including Anil Deshmukh, Mehbooba Mufti

Let us tell you that the process of arrest, seizure and investigation of ED under PMLA was challenged through 242 petitions across the country.

The petitions were filed by 242 people, including Karti Chidambaram, son of former Union minister P Chidambaram, former Maharashtra minister Anil Deshmukh and former Jammu and Kashmir chief minister Mehbooba Mufti.

The Supreme Court has upheld the powers of the ED by hearing these petitions.

PMLA was called unconstitutional in the petition

Explain that under this PMLA Act, the right to arrest, to grant bail, and to confiscate property is outside the purview of CrPC.

Describing the PMLA Act as unconstitutional in the petitions filed in the Supreme Court, it was said that the procedure given in its CrPC regarding investigation and trial of any cognizable offence is not followed.

But now the Supreme Court has upheld the ED's authority under the PMLA Act.

Here is the decision of Supreme Court

  1. According to the order, the powers of ED to arrest, to seize, to attach properties, to raid and to take statements have been retained.

  2. The Supreme Court said that the complaint ECIR cannot be equated with FIR. This is an internal document of ED.

  3. The Supreme Court said that it is not necessary to give the ECIR report to the accused. It is enough to just show the reason during the arrest.

Tesla's Full-Self Driving Software Will Be Launched in China Soon, The Company Got Permission During Musk's Visit

Ola CEO Hemant Bakshi Resigns, Had Joined The Company In January, Left The Company Amid Preparations for IPO

Coconut Water Acts Like Poison in These Diseases, Know When Not to Drink This Healthy Beverage

UGC NET Not on June 16, Rescheduled to This Date, Chairman Cites Reason

Lucknow Super Giants Vs Mumbai Indians: TATA IPL 2024 – Match Details And Lots More…